<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for scottlinux.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scottlinux.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scottlinux.com</link>
	<description>scottlinux.com - a place to geek out</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:22:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How To Dual Boot OS X and Linux by AT</title>
		<link>http://scottlinux.com/2011/06/14/how-to-dual-boot-os-x-and-linux/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>AT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottlinux.com/?p=2054#comment-579</guid>
		<description>I also got it to work on OSX Lion, a different way.

I created a partition of 1GB using Disk Utility (in the Applications/Utilities folder on your Macintosh). Then I downloaded the rEFIt ISO image available here: http://refit.sourceforge.net/#download , and used Disk Utility to restore it to the newly created partition. (You can do that by right-clicking on the file and opening-with Disk Utility).

Finally, I &#039;blessed&#039; the partition using the bless command:
sudo bless --device /dev/disk0s3 --setBoot

I used /dev/disk0s3 because I installed rEFIt on the second partition. The numbers are off, because OSX automatically creates a recovery partition. Thus, if you install rEFIt on your first partition, you can use:

first partition = /dev/disk0s2
second partition = /dev/disk0s3
third partition = /dev/disk0s4

Use the correct disk for your partition. Note that if you do this step wrong, you won&#039;t lose any data, but you might have to boot from the CD, run a recovery shell, and try the command again to get it right. And of course, you should make a backup anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also got it to work on OSX Lion, a different way.</p>
<p>I created a partition of 1GB using Disk Utility (in the Applications/Utilities folder on your Macintosh). Then I downloaded the rEFIt ISO image available here: <a href="http://refit.sourceforge.net/#download" rel="nofollow">http://refit.sourceforge.net/#download</a> , and used Disk Utility to restore it to the newly created partition. (You can do that by right-clicking on the file and opening-with Disk Utility).</p>
<p>Finally, I &#8216;blessed&#8217; the partition using the bless command:<br />
sudo bless &#8211;device /dev/disk0s3 &#8211;setBoot</p>
<p>I used /dev/disk0s3 because I installed rEFIt on the second partition. The numbers are off, because OSX automatically creates a recovery partition. Thus, if you install rEFIt on your first partition, you can use:</p>
<p>first partition = /dev/disk0s2<br />
second partition = /dev/disk0s3<br />
third partition = /dev/disk0s4</p>
<p>Use the correct disk for your partition. Note that if you do this step wrong, you won&#8217;t lose any data, but you might have to boot from the CD, run a recovery shell, and try the command again to get it right. And of course, you should make a backup anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu 11.04 Change From Unity To Classic Gnome by ActionParsnip</title>
		<link>http://scottlinux.com/2011/03/05/ubuntu-11-04-change-from-unity-to-classic-gnome/#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator>ActionParsnip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottlinux.com/?p=1582#comment-578</guid>
		<description>Install Xubuntu 11.10 and it will still be Oneiric but not have Unity. Problem solved. Your Gnome apps will run equally as well in XFCE as The do in Gnome. No extra steps needed and Unity is not even an insyalled package. A little research would have shown you that. Instead of trying to remove Unity you could have installed a different desktop as there are LOTS of alternatives to Gnome not using Unity.

RE Support, you won&#039;t be supported in #ubuntu on irc.freenode.net nor in the Ubuntu questions section on Freenode either. You may find forums and duplicate the steps but as for asking your own question you will need to post in the Mint places.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Install Xubuntu 11.10 and it will still be Oneiric but not have Unity. Problem solved. Your Gnome apps will run equally as well in XFCE as The do in Gnome. No extra steps needed and Unity is not even an insyalled package. A little research would have shown you that. Instead of trying to remove Unity you could have installed a different desktop as there are LOTS of alternatives to Gnome not using Unity.</p>
<p>RE Support, you won&#8217;t be supported in #ubuntu on irc.freenode.net nor in the Ubuntu questions section on Freenode either. You may find forums and duplicate the steps but as for asking your own question you will need to post in the Mint places.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu 11.04 Change From Unity To Classic Gnome by yereverluvinunclebert</title>
		<link>http://scottlinux.com/2011/03/05/ubuntu-11-04-change-from-unity-to-classic-gnome/#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>yereverluvinunclebert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottlinux.com/?p=1582#comment-577</guid>
		<description>I did educate myself in that I already know Mint is based on Ubuntu and that is all I needed to know. I tried to keep Ubuntu and get rid of Unity but Unity kept getting in the way, in the end it would not let me. (see post above) I need an out-of-the box solution as my clients ask me to make occasional suggestions as to the most usable o/s for their needs. They tend to be even more naive than me so it needs to be simple and usable as it comes out-of-the-box. I have to be confident that the choice will be a good one for them and that I can help them navigate around it. Unity is actually an annoying interface. It is neither the useful GUI that you find on a iPad nor a friendly workstation-like environment to sit and work in. It falls between both stools. It was plain annoying to look at and annoying to use.  There is no point in getting used to something that is going to change. Ubuntu overhauls the UI regularly, I shall just wait until you get it back in shape again. Re: support, almost all the solutions that apply to Ubuntu apply to Mint. Near enough the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did educate myself in that I already know Mint is based on Ubuntu and that is all I needed to know. I tried to keep Ubuntu and get rid of Unity but Unity kept getting in the way, in the end it would not let me. (see post above) I need an out-of-the box solution as my clients ask me to make occasional suggestions as to the most usable o/s for their needs. They tend to be even more naive than me so it needs to be simple and usable as it comes out-of-the-box. I have to be confident that the choice will be a good one for them and that I can help them navigate around it. Unity is actually an annoying interface. It is neither the useful GUI that you find on a iPad nor a friendly workstation-like environment to sit and work in. It falls between both stools. It was plain annoying to look at and annoying to use.  There is no point in getting used to something that is going to change. Ubuntu overhauls the UI regularly, I shall just wait until you get it back in shape again. Re: support, almost all the solutions that apply to Ubuntu apply to Mint. Near enough the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shuttleworth Removes Terminal From Ubuntu 12.04 by scott</title>
		<link>http://scottlinux.com/2011/07/06/shuttleworth-removes-terminal-from-ubuntu-12-04/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottlinux.com/?p=2153#comment-576</guid>
		<description>Viola? :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viola? :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu 11.04 Change From Unity To Classic Gnome by ActionParsnip</title>
		<link>http://scottlinux.com/2011/03/05/ubuntu-11-04-change-from-unity-to-classic-gnome/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>ActionParsnip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottlinux.com/?p=1582#comment-575</guid>
		<description>Mint is only based on Ubuntu, the same way Ubuntu is based on Debian. You can use KDE or XFCE in Ubuntu and you will not get the Unity bar.
Gnome is not the only desktop. You should explore this and educate yourself.
Mint is not supported in any of the Ubuntu channels, it has its own IRC channel and forums so you have significantly reduced your support base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mint is only based on Ubuntu, the same way Ubuntu is based on Debian. You can use KDE or XFCE in Ubuntu and you will not get the Unity bar.<br />
Gnome is not the only desktop. You should explore this and educate yourself.<br />
Mint is not supported in any of the Ubuntu channels, it has its own IRC channel and forums so you have significantly reduced your support base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu 11.04 Change From Unity To Classic Gnome by ActionParsnip</title>
		<link>http://scottlinux.com/2011/03/05/ubuntu-11-04-change-from-unity-to-classic-gnome/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>ActionParsnip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottlinux.com/?p=1582#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Ubuntu &#039;11&#039; doesn&#039;t exist. There is Ubuntu 11.04 (Codenamed Natty) and Ubuntu 11.10 (Codenamed Oneiric). You are tarnishing an entire release based on the new Gnome desktop which is ignorant at best. You can use XFCE in Ubuntu 11.10 and it will STILL be Oneiric but you will be using something that looks like, and runs like Gnome2. As I have to tell the ill educated over and over and OVER; 

GNOME IS NOT THE ONLY DESKTOP

Try KDE. Try LXDE. You don&#039;t have to use Unity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ubuntu &#8217;11&#8242; doesn&#8217;t exist. There is Ubuntu 11.04 (Codenamed Natty) and Ubuntu 11.10 (Codenamed Oneiric). You are tarnishing an entire release based on the new Gnome desktop which is ignorant at best. You can use XFCE in Ubuntu 11.10 and it will STILL be Oneiric but you will be using something that looks like, and runs like Gnome2. As I have to tell the ill educated over and over and OVER; </p>
<p>GNOME IS NOT THE ONLY DESKTOP</p>
<p>Try KDE. Try LXDE. You don&#8217;t have to use Unity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu 11.04 Change From Unity To Classic Gnome by yereverluvinunclebert</title>
		<link>http://scottlinux.com/2011/03/05/ubuntu-11-04-change-from-unity-to-classic-gnome/#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>yereverluvinunclebert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 08:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottlinux.com/?p=1582#comment-573</guid>
		<description>I still have Ubuntu now but in the shape of Linux Mint, no unity and it simply works. Wherever Unity goes I will start to go elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still have Ubuntu now but in the shape of Linux Mint, no unity and it simply works. Wherever Unity goes I will start to go elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu 11.04 Change From Unity To Classic Gnome by svegress</title>
		<link>http://scottlinux.com/2011/03/05/ubuntu-11-04-change-from-unity-to-classic-gnome/#comment-572</link>
		<dc:creator>svegress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 03:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottlinux.com/?p=1582#comment-572</guid>
		<description>Bill, no it is better than Vista but  not  better than Windows 7.  Even then, based on the available benchmarks,  Ubuntu is still faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, no it is better than Vista but  not  better than Windows 7.  Even then, based on the available benchmarks,  Ubuntu is still faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu 11.04 Change From Unity To Classic Gnome by bill domenico</title>
		<link>http://scottlinux.com/2011/03/05/ubuntu-11-04-change-from-unity-to-classic-gnome/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>bill domenico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 01:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottlinux.com/?p=1582#comment-571</guid>
		<description>11 is a worthless piece of xxxx.  If I wanted an ipad, I would have bought 1.
11 makes vista look good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>11 is a worthless piece of xxxx.  If I wanted an ipad, I would have bought 1.<br />
11 makes vista look good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Install aircrack-ng on Debian Linux by Anon</title>
		<link>http://scottlinux.com/2012/01/13/install-aircrack-ng-on-debian-linux/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 17:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottlinux.com/?p=2858#comment-570</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for sharing this, it helped quite a bit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for sharing this, it helped quite a bit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Convert VDI to VMDK &#8211; VirtualBox to VMware by oZem</title>
		<link>http://scottlinux.com/2011/06/24/convert-vdi-to-vmdk-virtualbox-to-vmware/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>oZem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 23:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottlinux.com/?p=2081#comment-569</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip.
If you convert Linux machines: in the grub menu, press &#039;e&#039; and adjust root=/dev/sda1 to be root=/dev/hda1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip.<br />
If you convert Linux machines: in the grub menu, press &#8216;e&#8217; and adjust root=/dev/sda1 to be root=/dev/hda1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu 11.04 Change From Unity To Classic Gnome by Helen Neely</title>
		<link>http://scottlinux.com/2011/03/05/ubuntu-11-04-change-from-unity-to-classic-gnome/#comment-568</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen Neely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 17:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottlinux.com/?p=1582#comment-568</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this nice tips. I have just checked my system but could not configure it as described in step 2 above. Will have to revert to the old version or try some other flavour of linux instead.

Nice job BTW :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this nice tips. I have just checked my system but could not configure it as described in step 2 above. Will have to revert to the old version or try some other flavour of linux instead.</p>
<p>Nice job BTW :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shuttleworth Removes Terminal From Ubuntu 12.04 by The Genius</title>
		<link>http://scottlinux.com/2011/07/06/shuttleworth-removes-terminal-from-ubuntu-12-04/#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>The Genius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 02:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottlinux.com/?p=2153#comment-567</guid>
		<description>Hey dude maybe you should try expanding that window a little then... VIOLA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A terminal!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey dude maybe you should try expanding that window a little then&#8230; VIOLA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A terminal!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OS X Lion How To Reverse Scroll Direction by Alfon</title>
		<link>http://scottlinux.com/2011/07/20/os-x-lion-how-to-reverse-scroll-direction/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottlinux.com/?p=2265#comment-566</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

